ABSTRACT
Introduction The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in renewed emphasis on escalation decisions and discussions, often conducted by junior doctors without any training. Our local Foundation Year (FY) teaching does not address these topics. The distress caused by poor communication regarding escalation is well recognised. Our goal was to improve FY doctors’ confidence in this area and consequently improve quality of patient care. Method In PDSA cycle one, email questionnaires established a lack of confidence amongst FY1 doctors. This cycle resulted in the design of a one-hour workshop by middle-grade trainees interested in geriatrics or acute medicine. This workshop included an interactive teaching session, followed by demonstrative and participant role play. Feedback from the first workshop closed cycle two. In cycle three, a subsequent workshop was amended according to feedback. Workshop participants completed anonymous feedback, rating the impact on their confidence. Results Thirteen FY1 doctors responded positively to the initial questionnaire, with nine able to attend a workshop. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires asked respondents to rate their confidence from 1 (low) to 5 (high). Comparison demonstrated an increase in confidence making decisions from an average of 1.8 to 3.7 and discussing decisions with patients from 2 to 3.1. Qualitative feedback emphasised benefit from participant role play and the need for longer workshops. Conclusion Our project highlighted the need and desire for FY training in making and discussing escalation decisions. A one-hour workshop increased confidence in this group, though we acknowledge this is a surrogate marker of improved care. Workshop uptake was limited by a small local FY1 cohort, leave and clinical commitments. Though convenient, a one-hour session did not provide adequate time to realise full benefit. We hope to address these issues by integrating longer sessions into the protected teaching for all FY doctors in our health board.
ABSTRACT
Policy responses to COVID-19 have illuminated how children and young people’s human rights were all too often side-lined by adult concerns. With mounting queries during the first ‘lockdown’ in Scotland (March 2020), the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland asked the Observatory of Children’s Human Rights Scotland to undertake an independent Children’s Rights Impact Assessment of COVID-19 emergency public health measures on children and young people in Scotland. The resulting analysis proved not only productive for immediate policy advocacy but had broader lessons about how states parties can respect, protect and fulfil children and young people’s human rights at times of crisis and disaster. This requires challenging adult approaches and orientations to policy, so all of children and young people’s rights to provision, protection and participation are met, especially groups of children and young people who may be at particular risk of rights’ violations. This editorial outlines the process and substantive learning from the independent CRIA, from a range of experts, including children and young people. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of International Journal of Human Rights is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)